Im not sure about this but hasn't research like this been going on for a long time?

yes, it has. considering that "The first medically active substance isolated from a snake’s venom came from a Brazilian pit viper, Bothrops jararaca, in 1949." and if it takes a long time just isolate specific proteins and enzymes from the venom, it must of been going on from at least 1925.

Isn't evolution clever? Why don't all snakes have venom? How was it decided one group of snakes would have venom and another would not? How did the ability to have venom "spread" from snake to snake? This is junk science because the foundational premise is wrong. Evolution is a lie.

I thought junk science was making statements without backing them up scientifically or backing them up with bs. I can see why you would think it unbelievable that evolution is so fantastic and "evolved", but is it more likely that some all powerful being created us 8000 years ago for entertainment and then left us to screw the world up? If that is the theory you prefer, go with it. Pretty smart of him to put fossils and bones in the ground to throw us off the scent.

Answer my questions. Don't just come up with your anit God rhetoric. Where did the poison come from? How did the first poisonous snake become poisonsous? Why aren't all snakes poisonous then? The fossils and bones in the ground that you refer to do not prove the theory of evolution. Examine the evidence. Darwin's theory does not hold up.

Do you even know what evolution is? You're just asking stupid questions to get into a pointless debate. Get your head out of the Bible and look up some facts first, junior. You're not ready for a debate yet. Here's some clues: "random mutations" and "natural selection."

Dude u dont know what u are talking about how can an explosion large enough to create other elements come outa nowhere outa nothing?

What if the Bible was in fact right and "natural selection" and "random mutations" also had a role in the evolving different species along the way

umm correct me if im wrong but i thought the proper term is venemous..

cwbabcock, it is quite clear that your understanding of Science in general is horribly flawed. At first I thought "this must be a troll post." But then I noticed that "Gawd" has been invoked and therefore logic and reason no longer had a place in this argument.

And whats this about anti-gawd rhetoric? By the very nature of your argument you are anti-god in every way. Who is to say that your view of creation is the correct one? Because it says so in a Bible that was written by Jewish priests 2000 years ago (merely as guide to living and not meant to be taken literally)? What makes that any more relevant than, say, Scandinavian folklore and Norse Mythology? Because a charismatic schizophrenic said he was born of GAWD?

Arnold Glagow once said "The fewer the facts, the stronger the opinion" and boy do you prove him right. But it's ok, I was once like that too. But then I got an education :)

And if it was a troll post, I commend you - you successfully trolled!