The Ties That Bind

The Grouse
Our wireless manifest destiny is hampered by vaporware

Wireless: cutting the connection: Photo by iStockphoto

Since long before the dawn of this century (always wanted to say that), tech pundits and proselytizers have been consulting their trusty prediction machines and proclaiming “The Year of Wireless.” It happened when IR ports showed up on laptops, then again when wireless mice began gracing desktops. Nearly everyone got on the bandwagon when Wi-Fi appeared, followed again with GPRS, EDGE, EVDO, etc—and of course with that most overpromised and underdelivered of technologies, Bluetooth. This year, the experts are at it again, placing bets on new technologies that promise to finally release us mortals from the coils of copper that clutter our homes and offices and make transferring data, media and power a nuisance.

No doubt you’re excited by all this, but it is my grave duty to poke a pin in your bubble. Like Bill Murray’s forlorn weatherman in Groundhog Day, I can see the future, and it’s looking an awful lot like today: Welcome to “The Year of Still Wired.”

The most recent example of further delayed gratification came a week ago when wireless charge pad-maker, Splashpower, announced they were “restructuring,” which is business-speak for broke. Splashpower had been working on a technology that seemed to have fantastic potential—the idea being that you’d leave this special pad on a table or desk and then plop all your various portable electronics on it to charge them via induction, eliminating the need to plug anything in. It’s such a tantalizing concept that there are at least two other companies (eCoupled and WildCharge) also working on similar systems. WildCharge is the first out of the gate and already has a $60 charging pad on the market, along with a special $35 adapter for use with RAZR V3 phones. They plan to put out an adapter for iPod Nanos soon. But I’m prepared to say that while their goal is a noble one—and I hope the concept of wireless charging is embraced—their model doesn’t seem sound to me.

The obvious, ideal, solution is that the charging equipment is built into devices in the first place by the manufacturer, exactly like rechargeable electric toothbrushes. I simply don’t want to pay $35 or more each for the half-dozen portable devices in my household, on top of what I’ve already shelled out. Perhaps one of these companies is working on such licensing deals with a major manufacturer already, but I don’t expect to be wirelessly charging anything in this manner for at least a few more years. That’s a bummer—this concept was demoed to me at least 5 years ago, and hasn’t really progressed since.

Page 1 of 2 12next ›last »

2 Comments

Comments

Article Rating:
1
2
3
4
5

"that most overpromised and underdelivered of technologies, Bluetooth..."
My friends and I use Bluetooth all the time to transfer files between cellphones (we're in Europe; maybe the average American cellphone isn't as capable as here), as well as for wireless mice and keyboards in the classroom and at home. With it's small size, cost and power consumption, and wide standardization, I would bill Bluetooth as one of the successes of the wireless world.

"Common standards people—..."
I too lament the gap between the development of a technology and its availability to the average consumer (as in the case of wireless charging - it's a shame that it will take so long to get those chargers inside the devices where they need to be). But in this case it seems like you're saying that the technology isn't ready for the mass market yet. In that case, we shouldn't adopt any standard until we have one that works!

0 out of 0 people found this comment helpful
I found this comment
Article Rating:
1
2
3
4
5

Yes you are right in your assumption. You would assume that being the worlds superpower, The USA would strive in all aspects of technology. But in this day and age, somthing as simple yet popular as a cell phone, the USA seems to be in the stone age!
I grew up in europe, so i know the phones over there. They are more affordable, there is MUCH, MUCH more choice, and they all tend to have the most up to date technology available when they are brought out.
Unfortuanitly in America, there are very very few models available, and only about 5 are worth buying.
Also in america, most services have this terrible way of making phones WITHOUT SIM CARDS. So if your stupid enough to buy the phone, your locked into that service PERMINATELY!
Well... This article was not about cell phones... so ill shut up now...

0 out of 0 people found this comment helpful
I found this comment

Popular Tags

Regular Features

  • The Grouse with Jon Chase | Tech's shortcomings exposed


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
Current theme: Technology You Love

Subscribe for 2 free issues!

may2008_cover.jpg